{"id":55621,"date":"2023-08-17T11:26:23","date_gmt":"2023-08-17T16:26:23","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=55621"},"modified":"2023-08-17T11:26:23","modified_gmt":"2023-08-17T16:26:23","slug":"mo-failure-to-allow-dui-suspect-to-contact-lawyer-before-bac-test-doesnt-require-suppression","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=55621","title":{"rendered":"MO: Failure to allow DUI suspect to contact lawyer before BAC test doesn&#8217;t require suppression"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>The state\u2019s statutory failure to allow defendant to contact a lawyer before a BAC test doesn\u2019t require suppression of the BAC test. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.courts.mo.gov\/file.jsp?id=198438\">Dunbar v. Dir. of Revenue<\/a>, 2023 Mo. App. LEXIS 582 (Aug. 15, 2023).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cMovant provides no facts or evidence to show a reasonable probability that even if the challenged search was unlawful, the Court would have excluded the evidence from the search for sentencing purposes. He therefore cannot demonstrate that counsel was ineffective for failing to file a motion to suppress evidence or to otherwise challenge the search of his vehicle. Movant has failed to show Strickland prejudice, and his claims should be denied.\u201d Paris v. United States, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 142562 (N.D.Tex. July 10, 2023).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Defendant\u2019s arrest and search was completely unjustified. The trial court erred in not suppressing and dismissing the case. State v. Price, 2023 MT 154, 2023 Mont. LEXIS 810 (Aug. 15, 2023).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The state\u2019s statutory failure to allow defendant to contact a lawyer before a BAC test doesn\u2019t require suppression of the BAC test. Dunbar v. Dir. of Revenue, 2023 Mo. App. LEXIS 582 (Aug. 15, 2023). \u201cMovant provides no facts or &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=55621\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[50,55,14],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-55621","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-arrest-or-entry-on-arrest","category-drug-testing","category-exclusionary-rule"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/55621","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=55621"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/55621\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":55622,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/55621\/revisions\/55622"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=55621"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=55621"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=55621"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}