The government subpoenaed emails from defendant. Suspecting that some were deleted, a search warrant was issued for his account, and the missing emails were found. Thus, the sentence was enhanced for destruction of evidence under U.S.S.G. \u00a7 3C1.1. United States v. Olson, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 134626 (D.D.C. Aug. 3, 2023).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
One defendant can\u2019t join in another codefendant\u2019s motion to suppress when he doesn\u2019t have standing for the place of the search. United States v. Colon-Torres, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 134259 (D.P.R. Aug. 1, 2023).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201c[T]he three controlled buys within a two-week period well established that the defendant was engaged in an illegal drug distribution operation \u2018and had access to a supply for sale.\u2019\u201d Commonwealth v. Lewis, 2023 Mass. App. LEXIS 105 (Aug. 3, 2023).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
The government subpoenaed emails from defendant. Suspecting that some were deleted, a search warrant was issued for his account, and the missing emails were found. Thus, the sentence was enhanced for destruction of evidence under U.S.S.G. \u00a7 3C1.1. United States … Continue reading