After Iowa permitted open carry, accosting defendant for carrying a firearm lacked reasonable suspicion. United States v. McMillion, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 117283 (S.D. Iowa June 30, 2023).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The search warrant for defendant\u2019s cell phone permitted a search by use of biometric information but not getting the password. Defendant consented to providing the password. United States v. Hinson, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 117396 (N.D. Ohio July 7, 2023).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Defendant\u2019s inability to produce the rental agreement for the car he was driving raised questions of his authority to possess the car. That justified the 10 second delay in contacting the officer with the drug dog and then running the dog. United States v. Cates, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 17250 (10th Cir. July 7, 2023).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
After Iowa permitted open carry, accosting defendant for carrying a firearm lacked reasonable suspicion. United States v. McMillion, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 117283 (S.D. Iowa June 30, 2023). The search warrant for defendant\u2019s cell phone permitted a search by use … Continue reading