A search warrant for a cell phone includes the SD card in it. United States v. Glatz, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 114963 (E.D. Tenn. July 5, 2023).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
A jury question on probable cause to arrest remained, and that avoids qualified immunity for now. Johnson v. Barr, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 17019 (9th Cir. July 6, 2023).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Defendant\u2019s post-conviction claim that the warrant was based on three controlled buys that should have been challenged was speculative. State v. Miller, 2023-Ohio-2290, 2023 Ohio App. LEXIS 2304 (7th Dist. June 26, 2023).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cStewart, however, challenges these issues for the first time on appeal. Stewart did not file a motion to suppress the evidence, he made no objections to the introduction of the evidence at trial and he did not challenge the inclusion of the evidence in his post-trial motion. Thus, Stewart is procedurally barred from challenging these issues. Shinstock v. State, 220 So. 3d 967, 970 (Miss. 2017) (“‘The rule that failure to object’ at trial bars raising the issue on appeal ‘applies to Fourth Amendment claims as well.'” \u2026 Additionally, Stewart failed to ask this Court to consider a plain error analysis until his reply brief, after the State had already pointed out this issue and argued waiver.\u201d Stewart v. State, 2023 Miss. LEXIS 184 (July 6, 2023).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
A search warrant for a cell phone includes the SD card in it. United States v. Glatz, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 114963 (E.D. Tenn. July 5, 2023). A jury question on probable cause to arrest remained, and that avoids qualified … Continue reading