Review of whether there is probable cause for a warrant is not de novo; it\u2019s whether there is a substantial basis for finding probable cause, and there\u2019s that here. United States v. Jones, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81177 (S.D. Ga. May 9, 2023).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Defendant\u2019s claim of a lack of reasonable suspicion for a stop was based at worst on a reasonable mistake of fact that would not lead to suppression. United States v. Brown, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81462 (W.D. Pa. May 8, 2023).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cHere, the Magistrate Judge did not err in concluding that Dancy failed to make the requisite showing [under Franks]. Dancy fails to identify what false statements or omissions are in the affidavit, let alone make the connection that they were necessary to the issuing judge’s finding of probable cause.\u201d United States v. Dancy, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81507 (D. Minn. May 10, 2023).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Even if the search under the warrant was excessive, which isn\u2019t apparent, other exceptions justified the search. United States v. Cummings, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80721 (D. Haw. May 9, 2023).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Review of whether there is probable cause for a warrant is not de novo; it\u2019s whether there is a substantial basis for finding probable cause, and there\u2019s that here. United States v. Jones, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81177 (S.D. Ga. … Continue reading