{"id":54737,"date":"2023-04-19T06:54:00","date_gmt":"2023-04-19T11:54:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=54737"},"modified":"2023-04-20T06:55:32","modified_gmt":"2023-04-20T11:55:32","slug":"ca9-mere-typo-in-sw-affidavit-doesnt-support-franks-challenge","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=54737","title":{"rendered":"CA9: Mere typo in SW affidavit doesn&#8217;t support <em>Franks<\/em> challenge"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Defendant\u2019s Franks challenge was conclusory and based on mere typographical errors. <a href=\"https:\/\/cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov\/datastore\/memoranda\/2023\/04\/17\/22-30012.pdf\">United States v. Howard<\/a>, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 9069 (9th Cir. Apr. 17, 2023).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Habeas petitioner\u2019s admission of procedural default of his Fourth Amendment claim was an admission there was an adequate state procedure. Keller v. Genovese, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 9082 (6th Cir. Apr. 17, 2023).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The government showed inevitable discovery applied to the inventory search of his belongings after arrest. United States v. Osorio, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66505 (D.N.M. Apr. 17, 2023).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Defendant\u2019s peeping tom stop led to looking at his cell phone. A subsequent search warrant for the phone was issued on independent probable cause. Even if the initial view was tainted, there was probable cause without it. Tatum v. State, 2023 Ga. App. LEXIS 164 (Apr. 17, 2023).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Defendant\u2019s Franks challenge was conclusory and based on mere typographical errors. United States v. Howard, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 9069 (9th Cir. Apr. 17, 2023). Habeas petitioner\u2019s admission of procedural default of his Fourth Amendment claim was an admission there &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=54737\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5,21,68,126],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-54737","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-cell-phones","category-franks-doctrine","category-inevitable-discovery","category-issue-preclusion"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54737","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=54737"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54737\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":54738,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54737\/revisions\/54738"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=54737"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=54737"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=54737"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}