Attorney-client privilege is reason for return of documents under F.R.Crim.P. 41(g), and Nevada recognizes that, too, regardless of whether there is an open investigation. In re Search Warrants Regarding Seizure of Documents, 2023 Nev. App. Unpub. LEXIS 131 (Apr. 7, 2023).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The search of defendant\u2019s car was justified under the automobile exception for the smell of marijuana and as a parole search. United States v. Ford, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62655 (S.D. Ill. Apr. 10, 2023).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
A visible firearm as the officer walked up to the car was reasonable suspicion in Illinois. United States v. Morris, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62659 (S.D. Ill. Apr. 10, 2023).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Hot pursuit into defendant\u2019s house to arrest him failed when there was no justification for the arrest or entry. State v. Moses, 2023 La. App. LEXIS 566 (La. App. 4 Cir Apr. 10, 2023).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Attorney-client privilege is reason for return of documents under F.R.Crim.P. 41(g), and Nevada recognizes that, too, regardless of whether there is an open investigation. In re Search Warrants Regarding Seizure of Documents, 2023 Nev. App. Unpub. LEXIS 131 (Apr. 7, … Continue reading