{"id":54678,"date":"2023-04-07T07:57:23","date_gmt":"2023-04-07T12:57:23","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=54678"},"modified":"2023-04-07T07:57:23","modified_gmt":"2023-04-07T12:57:23","slug":"e-d-tenn-mislabeling-sw-attachments-not-worthy-of-exclusion","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=54678","title":{"rendered":"E.D.Tenn.: Mislabeling SW attachments not worthy of exclusion"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Accidental reverse numbering of Attachments A and B didn\u2019t make the search warrant void. United States v. Deakins, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60866 (E.D. Tenn. Apr. 6, 2023).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Plaintiff\u2019s claim that the Director of National Intelligence violates the Fourth Amendment by mind reading him doesn\u2019t state a plausible claim. <a href=\"https:\/\/ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov\/cgi-bin\/show_public_doc?2023cv0728-3\">Sherven v. Office of the Dir. of Nat&#8217;l Intel.<\/a>, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60405 (D.D.C. Apr. 5, 2023).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Plaintiff\u2019s excessive force claim fails under qualified immunity because, when the officer was breaking up a fight, he got hit by plaintiff, too. Not an obviously clear case. Grandy v. Huenke, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 8235 (11th Cir. Apr. 6, 2023).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>State search warrants that end up in federal prosecutions are not evaluated under Rule 41. United States v. Jackson, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60723 (W.D. La. Apr. 3, 2023).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Accidental reverse numbering of Attachments A and B didn\u2019t make the search warrant void. United States v. Deakins, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60866 (E.D. Tenn. Apr. 6, 2023).* Plaintiff\u2019s claim that the Director of National Intelligence violates the Fourth Amendment &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=54678\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[14,15,65,40],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-54678","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-exclusionary-rule","category-f-r-crim-p-41","category-particularity","category-qualified-immunity"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54678","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=54678"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54678\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":54679,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54678\/revisions\/54679"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=54678"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=54678"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=54678"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}