{"id":54386,"date":"2023-02-24T17:46:50","date_gmt":"2023-02-24T22:46:50","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=54386"},"modified":"2023-02-24T17:46:50","modified_gmt":"2023-02-24T22:46:50","slug":"ca-unreasonable-stop-and-running-warrants-revealed-def-was-on-parole-suspicionless-parole-search-unreasonable","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=54386","title":{"rendered":"CA: Unreasonable stop and running warrants revealed def was on parole; suspicionless parole search unreasonable"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

A man on the street was stopped by police for no apparent reason. A records check revealed he was on parole with a warrantless search waiver on file. The warrantless search of his person was unreasonable, and the exclusionary rule should be applied. People v. McWilliams<\/a>, 2023 Cal. LEXIS 878 (Feb. 23, 2023):<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n

Responding to a report of suspicious activity in the area, a police officer unlawfully detained a bystander who had no apparent connection to the report. The officer ran a records search and learned that the bystander, Duvanh Anthony McWilliams, was on parole and subject to warrantless, suspicionless parole searches. The officer proceeded to search McWilliams and his vehicle, where the officer found an unloaded gun, ammunition, drugs, and drug paraphernalia.<\/p>

As a general rule, evidence seized as a result of an unlawful search or seizure is inadmissible against the defendant in a subsequent prosecution. But the law permits use of the evidence when the causal connection \u201cbetween the lawless conduct of the police and the discovery of the challenged evidence has \u2018become so attenuated as to dissipate the taint.\u2019\u201d (Wong Sun v. United States (1963) 371 U.S. 471, 487.) Here, the Court of Appeal held that the officer\u2019s discovery of McWilliams\u2019s parole search condition sufficiently attenuated the connection between the unlawful detention and the contraband found in McWilliams\u2019s vehicle. The Court of Appeal relied on cases allowing the admission of evidence seized incident to arrest on a valid warrant, where the warrant was discovered during an unlawful investigatory stop. (Utah v. Strieff (2016) 579 U.S. 232 (Strieff); People v. Brendlin (2008) 45 Cal.4th 262 (Brendlin).)<\/p>

We now reverse. Unlike an arrest on an outstanding warrant, a parole search is not a ministerial act dictated by judicial mandate (Strieff, supra, 579 U.S. at p. 240), but a matter of discretion. We conclude the officer\u2019s discretionary decision to conduct the parole search did not sufficiently attenuate the connection between the officer\u2019s initial unlawful decision to detain McWilliams and the discovery of contraband. The evidence therefore was not admissible against him.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

A man on the street was stopped by police for no apparent reason. A records check revealed he was on parole with a warrantless search waiver on file. The warrantless search of his person was unreasonable, and the exclusionary rule … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[14,58,35],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-54386","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-exclusionary-rule","category-probationparole-search","category-reasonable-suspicion"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54386","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=54386"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54386\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":54387,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54386\/revisions\/54387"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=54386"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=54386"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=54386"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}