In a cell phone search warrant, \u201cAlthough Trujillo argues that the date range from May 16, 2022, to present lacked \u2018legal justification,\u2019 Trujillo provides no explanation or authority as to how this date range rendered the warrant unconstitutionally general. There is no requirement under the Fourth Amendment that a warrant specify a date range at all.\u201d United States v. Trujillo, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23343 (D. Colo. Feb. 10, 2023).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The traffic stop was justified, as was running the DL. However, the officer held on to the license too long and extended the stop without ending it. The continuation of the stop lacked reasonable suspicion. United States v. Serna, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23083 (D. Ariz. Feb. 10, 2023).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
In a stalking and homicide case, the affidavit for search warrant was based on probable cause for his house and electronics. There was nexus and particularity. State v. Chaffier, 2023 Del. Super. LEXIS 70 (Jan. 17, 2023).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
For what it\u2019s worth: search warrant here was issued for records in a public agency. State v. Young, 2023 N.J. Super. LEXIS 14 (Feb. 13, 2023).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
In a cell phone search warrant, \u201cAlthough Trujillo argues that the date range from May 16, 2022, to present lacked \u2018legal justification,\u2019 Trujillo provides no explanation or authority as to how this date range rendered the warrant unconstitutionally general. There … Continue reading