In a 2255 ineffective assistance claim, \u201cDefendant fails to specify either how his Fourth Amendment rights were violated or what evidence counsel should have sought to suppress.\u201d That alone is enough to deny. It\u2019s denied on the merits, too. United States v. Alberto-Sosa, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9855 (E.D. Pa. Jan. 20, 2023).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
CI\u2019s information was sufficient that defendant was selling drugs from home, and that\u2019s nexus. State v. Morris, 2023-Ohio-168, 2023 Ohio App. LEXIS 148 (6th Dist. Jan. 20, 2023).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Defendant was stopped and handcuffed without probable cause or any safety justification. Next came a search of his car, also without probable cause. Suppressed. United States v. Biggs, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10070 (M.D. Tenn. Jan. 20, 2023).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
In a 2255 ineffective assistance claim, \u201cDefendant fails to specify either how his Fourth Amendment rights were violated or what evidence counsel should have sought to suppress.\u201d That alone is enough to deny. It\u2019s denied on the merits, too. United … Continue reading