The prosecution established defendant interfered with a search by remotely wiping her cell phone and watch when she knew they were in the possession of CID and to be searched in a manslaughter investigation. United States v. Strong, 2023 CCA LEXIS 2 (Army Ct. Crim. App. Jan. 6, 2023) (en banc).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
A lawyer was arrested for what he claimed was a false report of sexual misconduct involving a client. He sued the arresting officer claiming a Franks violation and failure to investigate. There was probable cause on the face of the arrest papers, and the Franks violation, if it was, wasn\u2019t material. Newport v. Payton<\/a>, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 282 (8th Cir. Jan. 6, 2023).* Law360: 8th Circ. Scraps Atty’s Federal Claims Against Police Officer<\/a> by Emily Sawicki<\/p>\n\n\n\n Plaintiff stated a claim for being pepper sprayed for free speech, but he fails on causation because this defendant wasn\u2019t around him. Laney v. City of St. Louis<\/a>, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 281 (8th Cir. Jan. 6, 2023).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" The prosecution established defendant interfered with a search by remotely wiping her cell phone and watch when she knew they were in the possession of CID and to be searched in a manslaughter investigation. United States v. Strong, 2023 CCA … Continue reading