The exclusionary rule does not apply in Domestic Violence Protective Order proceeding. Green v. State, 2022 Alas. LEXIS 140 (Dec. 14, 2022) (due process claim).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Multiple calls between the CI and defendant arranging a fentanyl deal and defendant showing up was probable cause for defendant\u2019s arrest. United States v. Cruz, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 223722 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 12, 2022).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The USMJ\u2019s finding of consent was based on credibility determinations of the three officers v. defendant who the court didn\u2019t believe, and it is not clearly erroneous. United States v. Mitchell, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 34180 (8th Cir. Dec. 13, 2022).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
This case involved a search warrant for a pond that was pumped empty and a body was found weighted down. Barfield v. State, 2022 Miss. App. LEXIS 453 (Dec. 13, 2022).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
The exclusionary rule does not apply in Domestic Violence Protective Order proceeding. Green v. State, 2022 Alas. LEXIS 140 (Dec. 14, 2022) (due process claim). Multiple calls between the CI and defendant arranging a fentanyl deal and defendant showing up … Continue reading