No standing to challenge acquiring the CSLI of another\u2019s cell phone. United States v. Lopez, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 215709 (E.D. Tenn. Oct. 24, 2022),* adopted, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 214604 (E.D. Tenn. Nov. 29, 2022).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Defendant\u2019s guilty plea waived his Fourth Amendment claim. United States v. Sears, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 33128 (10th Cir. Nov. 30, 2022).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Plaintiff claims he was falsely arrested for two rapes, but there was probable cause and arrest warrants, so his claim fails. Harper v. City of Phila., 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 33140 (3d Cir. Nov. 30, 2022).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Defendant got off a bus and into a waiting car, and the car was stopped because the owner was under a drug investigation. \u201cApplying this principle, the trooper’s request [to get out of the car] was a reasonable precaution given the information known to the trooper at the time of the stop, the odor of marihuana and defendant’s \u2018extremely nervous\u2019 demeanor during the encounter \u2026. We further note that at the time of the traffic stop, the underlying facts also provided\u00a0probable cause for the trooper to search defendant \u2026.\u201d People v. Watford, 2022 NY Slip Op 06836, 2022 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6733 (3d Dept. Dec. 1, 2022).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
No standing to challenge acquiring the CSLI of another\u2019s cell phone. United States v. Lopez, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 215709 (E.D. Tenn. Oct. 24, 2022),* adopted, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 214604 (E.D. Tenn. Nov. 29, 2022).* Defendant\u2019s guilty plea waived … Continue reading