A positive UA is reasonable suspicion for a search of a probationer\u2019s home. United States v. Walker, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 209507 (M.D. Fla. Oct. 17, 2022).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cTo prevail on a Fourth Amendment claim for false arrest, Johnson must establish that Osborne was arrested without probable cause.\u201d \u201cThe probable cause balance favors the government when an arrest is executed pursuant to a warrant.\u201d \u201cBecause Myers arrested Osborne pursuant to a facially valid warrant, we presume that the warrant and the information in support of it are valid.\u201d Plaintiff\u2019s arguments are irrelevant to the probable cause analysis. Johnson v. Myers, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 31654 (7th Cir. Nov. 16, 2022).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cTurner argues that the district court erred by denying his suppression motion because the affidavit submitted in support of the search warrant failed to establish probable cause. To that end, he contends that the \u2018affidavit relied on self-serving, unreliable statements from a dubious informant.\u2019 But even if that is true, the Supreme Court has held that the exclusionary rule does not apply when the evidence at issue was \u2018seized in reasonable, good-faith reliance on a search warrant that is subsequently held to be defective.\u2019 United States v. Leon, \u2026\u201d The CI was adequately supported for at least the good faith exception. United States v. Turner, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 31861 (6th Cir. Nov. 17, 2022).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
A positive UA is reasonable suspicion for a search of a probationer\u2019s home. United States v. Walker, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 209507 (M.D. Fla. Oct. 17, 2022). \u201cTo prevail on a Fourth Amendment claim for false arrest, Johnson must establish … Continue reading