The warrant here was for computer files created in a one week period. That was particular. United States v. Riego, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 130233 (D.N.M. July 22, 2022).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The district court\u2019s findings of fact support the finding of exigent circumstances, and they don\u2019t show police created exigency. United States v. Davis<\/a>, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 20168 (5th Cir. July 21, 2022).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n The dashcam video supports the officer\u2019s testimony defendant was stopped because he was parked in the middle of the road waving his arm and yelling. State v. Davis<\/a>, 2022-Ohio-2511, 2022 Ohio App. LEXIS 2373 (2d Dist. July 22, 2022).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n There was probable cause for a search warrant for defendant\u2019s DNA in a rape case. He got a Franks hearing, and there was no showing of reckless disregard, State v. Williams<\/a>, 2022-Ohio-2517, 2022 Ohio App. LEXIS 2374 (2d Dist. July 22, 2022).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" The warrant here was for computer files created in a one week period. That was particular. United States v. Riego, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 130233 (D.N.M. July 22, 2022). The district court\u2019s findings of fact support the finding of exigent … Continue reading