Reasonable suspicion is not required for a knock-and-talk. United States v. Raley, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 128634 (W.D. Ky. July 20, 2022).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The officer ran defendant\u2019s LPN and it came back with “verify proof of insurance status.” That justified the stop. Reasonable suspicion developed. United States v. Lawson<\/a>, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 19988 (6th Cir. July 19, 2022).<\/p>\n\n\n\n The warrantless seizure of defendant\u2019s already drawn blood was unreasonable because there was no exigency. Metabolizing of the blood was over, however, once it was drawn. Commonwealth v. Jones-Williams<\/a>, 2022 Pa. LEXIS 1035 (July 20, 2022).<\/p>\n\n\n\n The affidavit for warrant justified a nighttime search. People v. Rose<\/a>, 2022 NY Slip Op 04649, 2022 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4509 (2d Dept. July 20, 2022).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Reasonable suspicion is not required for a knock-and-talk. United States v. Raley, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 128634 (W.D. Ky. July 20, 2022). The officer ran defendant\u2019s LPN and it came back with “verify proof of insurance status.” That justified the … Continue reading