As to arrest warrants, Rule 41 and 21 U.S.C. \u00a7 879 aren\u2019t clear on whether a nighttime entry is barred for execution of an arrest warrant. (Tie goes to the government on reasonableness.) A violation of knock-and-announce doesn\u2019t invoke the exclusionary rule under Hudson. United States v. Borges, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 99699 (D.Ariz. June 2, 2022) (R&R).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
After the purposes of the traffic stop were complete, running the already at-hand drug dog around the car without reasonable suspicion unreasonably extended the stop. Dumond v. State<\/a>, 2022 Ark. App. 292, 2022 Ark. App. LEXIS 300 (June 1, 2022).<\/p>\n\n\n\n Arresting defendant in the doorway of his motel room was reasonable, and safety purposes allowed officers to open the door and survey. A protective sweep would be justified. State v. Davis<\/a>, 2022-Ohio-1875, 2022 Ohio App. LEXIS 1759 (2d Dist. June 3, 2022).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" As to arrest warrants, Rule 41 and 21 U.S.C. \u00a7 879 aren\u2019t clear on whether a nighttime entry is barred for execution of an arrest warrant. (Tie goes to the government on reasonableness.) A violation of knock-and-announce doesn\u2019t invoke the … Continue reading