When one leaves his cell phone in a car, he or she assumes the risk that the phone will be found by the police and searched. United States v. Hagy, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 89437 (S.D.W.Va. May 18, 2022).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cThey also propose facts they believe the police should have added to the affidavit. \u2026 But \u2018[t]he affidavit is judged on the adequacy of what it does contain, not on what it lacks, or on what a critic might say should have been added.\u2019 United States v. Allen, 211 F.3d 970, 975 (6th Cir. 2000); \u2026\u201d Franks challenge denied. United States v. Goddard, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 89143 (S.D.Ohio May 18, 2022).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
A parole search in Arkansas does not require reasonable suspicion. Hall v. State<\/a>, 2022 Ark. App. 232, 2022 Ark. App. LEXIS 241 (May 18, 2022).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n Torrential Downpour warrant for child pornography was reasonable. United States v. Harper, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 89375 (W.D.Tenn. May 18, 2022).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" When one leaves his cell phone in a car, he or she assumes the risk that the phone will be found by the police and searched. United States v. Hagy, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 89437 (S.D.W.Va. May 18, 2022). \u201cThey … Continue reading