{"id":52257,"date":"2022-04-30T14:17:10","date_gmt":"2022-04-30T19:17:10","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=52257"},"modified":"2022-04-30T14:17:10","modified_gmt":"2022-04-30T19:17:10","slug":"ca6-auto-exception-applies-even-where-driver-is-detained","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=52257","title":{"rendered":"CA6: Auto exception applies even where driver is detained"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>A vehicle is mobile for the automobile exception even though the driver is detained. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.opn.ca6.uscourts.gov\/opinions.pdf\/22a0174n-06.pdf\">United States v. Washington<\/a>, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 11511 (6th Cir. Apr. 28, 2022).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A bald tire in the back of a rental truck was so out of place as to constitute reasonable suspicion, along with a few other factors. United States v. Sanchez, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77141 (W.D.Mo. Mar. 9, 2022),* adopted, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77143 (W.D.Mo. Apr. 28, 2022).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy in a vehicle he rode to where the car was parked. He neither owned nor operated it, he was a mere passenger and not there when it was searched. United States v. Bass, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76337 (D.Mass. Apr. 27, 2022).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cMake no mistake, though: proving entitlement to a Franks hearing is no easy task. A defendant must show both that the affiant included a false statement made intentionally, knowingly, or with reckless disregard for the truth and that, without the false statement, the remnants of the affidavit could not support probable cause. \u2026 The district court committed no error in ruling that Tate did not carry that heavy burden.\u201d Omissions rarely make a Franks violation. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.opn.ca6.uscourts.gov\/opinions.pdf\/22a0171n-06.pdf\">United States v. Tate<\/a>, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 11440 (6th Cir. Apr. 26, 2022).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A vehicle is mobile for the automobile exception even though the driver is detained. United States v. Washington, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 11511 (6th Cir. Apr. 28, 2022). A bald tire in the back of a rental truck was so &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=52257\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[36,21,35,34],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-52257","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-automobile-exception","category-franks-doctrine","category-reasonable-suspicion","category-standing"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/52257","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=52257"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/52257\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":52258,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/52257\/revisions\/52258"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=52257"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=52257"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=52257"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}