The affidavit for the search warrant for defendant\u2019s phone didn\u2019t show nexus, but it was still relied upon in good faith. R&R rejected. United States v. Langford, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55162 (E.D.Okla. Mar. 28, 2022).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Sounds and observations of what might be going on inside showing violence might be occurring is exigency for a warrantless entry. State v. Rowley<\/a>, 2022-Ohio-997, 2022 Ohio App. LEXIS 899 (12th Dist. Mar. 28, 2022).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n It was not reasonable for the officer to conclude that defendant violated the traffic law before making the stop. The state injected a new theory on appeal not raised below, and it\u2019s waived. People v. Holiman<\/a>, 2022 Cal. App. LEXIS 250 (1st Dist. Mar. 28, 2022).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" The affidavit for the search warrant for defendant\u2019s phone didn\u2019t show nexus, but it was still relied upon in good faith. R&R rejected. United States v. Langford, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55162 (E.D.Okla. Mar. 28, 2022). Sounds and observations of … Continue reading