\u201cThe Court finds that Chronister unlawfully prolonged the traffic stop by pursuing an investigation into whether or not Lewis was in violation of his parole conditions.\u201d \u201cThe Court finds that Chronister did not believe at the time of the traffic stop that Lewis was in violation of any parole conditions.\u201d United States v. Lewis, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49465 (D.Nev. Mar. 21, 2022).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Opening a file of suspected child pornography that had been transmitted to NCMEC from Facebook and then to law enforcement was a search, but it was reasonable under the good faith exception and inevitable discovery. United States v. Holmes, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49838 (D.Ariz. Mar. 21, 2022).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The exclusionary rule does not apply to revocation of supervised release proceedings. United States v. Williams<\/a>, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 7348 (5th Cir. Mar. 18, 2022).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" \u201cThe Court finds that Chronister unlawfully prolonged the traffic stop by pursuing an investigation into whether or not Lewis was in violation of his parole conditions.\u201d \u201cThe Court finds that Chronister did not believe at the time of the traffic … Continue reading