A civil investigative subpoena to Facebook for information about posters of Covid misinformation was not unreasonable. n.3: \u201cMeta suggests that the Fourth Amendment requires the District to obtain a search warrant to get this information. \u2026 One sufficient response is that the Fourth Amendment protects only privacy interests that society accepts as objectively reasonable, see United States v. Kyle, 2022 D.C. App. LEXIS 58, at *3-4 (D.C. Feb. 10, 2022), and Facebook users do not have an objectively reasonable expectation of privacy in information that they include in public posts about COVID-19 vaccines and their identities.\u201d District of Columbia v. Meta Platforms, Inc., 2022 D.C. Super. LEXIS 2 (Mar. 9, 2022).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Child pornography traced to an IP address is probable cause for computers there. People v. Socciarelli<\/a>, 2022 NY Slip Op 01630, 2022 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1647 (4th Dept. Mar. 11, 2022).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n After a search warrant for records, the plaintiff sued for return of property and lost. Then it filed this action for a declaratory judgment that what it was doing wasn\u2019t illegal. That\u2019s essentially seeking a declaratory judgment barring prosecution. Denied. Hawk Innovative Tech, LLC v. United States, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46224 (N.D.Ga. Jan. 25, 2022).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" A civil investigative subpoena to Facebook for information about posters of Covid misinformation was not unreasonable. n.3: \u201cMeta suggests that the Fourth Amendment requires the District to obtain a search warrant to get this information. \u2026 One sufficient response is … Continue reading