\u201cThe Court notes that there is a dearth of caselaw on the issue of whether Xylazine qualifies as \u2018drug paraphernalia.\u2019 Regardless, as the weight of the evidence supports that Xylazine is frequently used as a diluent or cutting agent, the Court finds it falls within the definition of \u2018drug paraphernalia\u2019 pursuant to 21 U.S.C. \u00a7 863(d). Additionally, Defendant has not offered an explanation as to why Defendant ordered the Xylazine, and Defendant has not argued that Defendant sought to possess Xylazine for a legal use. Thus, the officers had sufficient probable cause to stop and detain Defendant.\u201d United States v. McAliley, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44258 (E.D.Pa. Mar. 14, 2022).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Six to nine month old information wasn\u2019t stale for a child pornography warrant. Albrecht v. State<\/a>, 2022 Ind. App. LEXIS 69 (Mar. 14, 2022).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n Overtinted windows justifies a traffic stop, and, here, the dashcam video supports that. United States v. Augustus, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44266 (E.D.Pa. Mar. 14, 2022).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" \u201cThe Court notes that there is a dearth of caselaw on the issue of whether Xylazine qualifies as \u2018drug paraphernalia.\u2019 Regardless, as the weight of the evidence supports that Xylazine is frequently used as a diluent or cutting agent, the … Continue reading