There was probable cause for a stop, and that quickly developed into probable cause to search from marijuana residue around the driver\u2019s seat. United States v. Estes, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41951 (D.Minn. Mar. 8, 2022).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Possession of a large quantity of meth doesn\u2019t create automatic nexus to defendant\u2019s home [but it can be close]. Here, there was information from a CI that added to that inference. United States v. Melvin, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42092 (M.D.Pa. Mar. 9, 2022).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Probable cause for plaintiff\u2019s arrest was shown, and that defeats his false arrest claim. Henderson v. McClain<\/a>, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 6155 (4th Cir. Mar. 9, 2022);* Ramirez v. City of Glendale<\/a>, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 6220 (9th Cir. Mar. 10, 2022).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n Defendant\u2019s search was valid as a parole search. He did not show unreasonableness that it was done by personal animus or to harass. United States v. Shelton<\/a>, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 6159 (6th Cir. Mar. 8, 2022).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" There was probable cause for a stop, and that quickly developed into probable cause to search from marijuana residue around the driver\u2019s seat. United States v. Estes, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41951 (D.Minn. Mar. 8, 2022).* Possession of a large … Continue reading