The search warrant for defendant\u2019s home did not allege he was involved in a crime, but the government showed that evidence still could have been found there. The search of his electronic devices in the home is a closer call, but the presumption accorded warrants carries the day. United States v. Harvey, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40979 (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 6, 2022).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The defense argued nexus wasn\u2019t shown for the search warrant affidavit, but the good faith exception would have saved it. This was a post-conviction challenge to defense counsel not moving to suppress. Hamilton v. State<\/a>, 2022 Ark. App. 122 (Mar. 9, 2022).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n A call about a shooting incident and defendant\u2019s car led to a stop. Plain view supported a seizure. United States v. Khanya, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41068 (D.Kan. Mar. 7, 2022).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" The search warrant for defendant\u2019s home did not allege he was involved in a crime, but the government showed that evidence still could have been found there. The search of his electronic devices in the home is a closer call, … Continue reading