{"id":51757,"date":"2022-03-08T08:16:27","date_gmt":"2022-03-08T13:16:27","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=51757"},"modified":"2022-03-08T10:06:58","modified_gmt":"2022-03-08T15:06:58","slug":"co-while-trial-court-erred-in-considering-officers-subjective-intent-there-still-wasnt-rs","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=51757","title":{"rendered":"CO: While trial court erred in considering officers&#8217; subjective intent, there still wasn&#8217;t RS"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>\u201cWe conclude that while the trial court erred in considering the officers&#8217; subjective intent in effectuating the seizure, it was nonetheless correct that the officers lacked reasonable and articulable suspicion to detain Brown. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court&#8217;s order suppressing Brown&#8217;s statements, albeit on other grounds.\u201d <a href=\"https:\/\/www.courts.state.co.us\/userfiles\/file\/Court_Probation\/Supreme_Court\/Opinions\/2021\/21SA110.pdf\">People v. Brown<\/a>, 2022 CO 11, 2022 Colo. LEXIS 180 (Mar. 7, 2022).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A warrant for a duplex residential building was not overbroad here. Apparently only one unit was occupied, and the other was vacant. Two weeks of continuous surveillance only saw defendant as a resident coming and going. A records search was consistent. It was reasonable to conclude the vacant unit was used by defendant for storage. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.njcourts.gov\/attorneys\/assets\/opinions\/appellate\/published\/a1068-18a1594-18a1884-18.pdf?c=IE0\">State v. Berry<\/a>, 2022 N.J. Super. LEXIS 27 (Mar. 7, 2022).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Defendant\u2019s guilty plea waived his suppression motion appeal. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.supremecourt.ohio.gov\/rod\/docs\/pdf\/11\/2022\/2022-Ohio-656.pdf\">State v. Milite<\/a>, 2022-Ohio-656, 2022 Ohio App. LEXIS 582 (11th Dist. Mar. 7, 2022).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\u201cWe conclude that while the trial court erred in considering the officers&#8217; subjective intent in effectuating the seizure, it was nonetheless correct that the officers lacked reasonable and articulable suspicion to detain Brown. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court&#8217;s order &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=51757\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7,86,35,129],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-51757","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-overbreadth","category-pretext","category-reasonable-suspicion","category-waiver"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/51757","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=51757"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/51757\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":51766,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/51757\/revisions\/51766"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=51757"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=51757"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=51757"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}