Twitter deactivated defendant\u2019s account for violation of its terms of service and reported him to NCMEC. Defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy in the files Twitter had preserved on him. \u201cThe Court finds under the circumstances of the case and in light of Twitter’s express zero tolerance policy for child sexual exploitation, once Defendant violated that policy, he lacked a reasonable expectation of privacy in the Twitter account.\u201d United States v. Sporn, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39070 (D.Kan. Mar. 4. 2022).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The government showed that release of the search warrant papers would potentially interfere with the investigation, so it is ordered sealed for up to one year. In the Matter of the Application of the United States of America for a Search Warrant, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38861 (D.S.C. Feb. 24, 2022).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The controlled buy here, with defendant coming from his house to another to deliver fentanyl, was probable cause. United States v. Ortiz, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39102 (N.D.Ohio Mar. 4, 2022).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
No judge would reasonably debate that petitioner\u2019s 2254 search claim is barred by Stone. CoA denied. Wynn v. Sec’y, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 5832 (11th Cir. Mar. 4, 2022).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Twitter deactivated defendant\u2019s account for violation of its terms of service and reported him to NCMEC. Defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy in the files Twitter had preserved on him. \u201cThe Court finds under the circumstances of the case … Continue reading