Pole camera surveillance of a homeless shelter for 14 days observing defendant coming and going was not an unreasonable search under the state or federal constitution, even if it was his home. People v. Destefano, 2022 NY Slip Op 22052, 2022 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 681 (Nassau Co. Feb. 18, 2022).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Defendant had no standing to contest an email search warrant where the email account wasn\u2019t his. United States v. Almaleh, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35260 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 28, 2022).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cVernon Hulett and Linda Heintzelman welcomed Roger Gillett to Mississippi by letting Gillett stay at their house; Gillett rewarded their hospitality by brutally murdering Hulett and Heintzelman and stealing Heintzelman’s truck.\u201d The petitioner\u2019s 2254 Fourth Amendment claim was Stone barred. Gilbert v. Director, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 34231 (S.D.Miss. Feb. 28, 2022).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Pole camera surveillance of a homeless shelter for 14 days observing defendant coming and going was not an unreasonable search under the state or federal constitution, even if it was his home. People v. Destefano, 2022 NY Slip Op 22052, … Continue reading