Plaintiff on parole did not state a claim that his parole officer gave his multiple cell phone to HSI for search. Petersen v. Buyard, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20986 (E.D.Cal. Feb. 4, 2022).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
It is not an offense in Minnesota to drive on private property without a driver\u2019s license. Without any binding appellate authority for support, the state\u2019s limited good faith exception does not apply. State v. Velisek<\/a>, 2022 Minn. App. LEXIS 18 (Feb. 7, 2022).<\/p>\n\n\n\n Officers strongly believed defendant was dealing drugs from his house. Officers conducting surveillance saw a man with a warrant for possession come out of the house and probably do a hand-to-hand drug transaction with a man in a car. The search warrant for the house was issued with probable cause. United States v. Reed<\/a>, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 3304 (8th Cir. Feb. 7, 2022).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Plaintiff on parole did not state a claim that his parole officer gave his multiple cell phone to HSI for search. Petersen v. Buyard, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20986 (E.D.Cal. Feb. 4, 2022). It is not an offense in Minnesota … Continue reading