The government used Google satellite images and distancing to corroborate the officer\u2019s testimony defendant didn\u2019t signal his turn in time. After the stop, the smell of marijuana was apparent. United States v. Miles, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14860 (S.D.Ind. Jan. 27, 2022).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
In an excessive force case, defendants object that an expert would testify that excessive force here violated the Fourth Amendment. Plaintiffs deny that but seek the expert\u2019s testimony that policy was violated. That\u2019s all denied. Kelly v. Stassi, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15081 (M.D.La. Jan. 27, 2022).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Defendant\u2019s motion to suppress is conclusory and alleges no facts. You can\u2019t get a hearing on that. Amend it. United States v. Aragon, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15075 (D.Utah Jan. 26, 2022).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
The government used Google satellite images and distancing to corroborate the officer\u2019s testimony defendant didn\u2019t signal his turn in time. After the stop, the smell of marijuana was apparent. United States v. Miles, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14860 (S.D.Ind. Jan. … Continue reading