\u201cMovant is not entitled to relief on Ground One because he fails to show that a motion to suppress on such grounds would have been meritorious because (1) his detention during the search was not unlawful and (2) he fails to show a causal connection between his allegedly unlawful detention and the discovery of the evidence he wanted to suppress.\u201d Taylor v. United States, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7610 (D.Ariz. Jan. 13, 2022).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Defense counsel wasn\u2019t ineffective for not raising a Fourth Amendment claim that would not have prevailed. [It\u2019s more elaborate than that, but that\u2019s the bottom line.] Howard v. United States, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7673 (E.D.Tenn. Jan. 14, 2022).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
\u201cMovant is not entitled to relief on Ground One because he fails to show that a motion to suppress on such grounds would have been meritorious because (1) his detention during the search was not unlawful and (2) he fails … Continue reading