If there is an arrest warrant, the executing officer doesn\u2019t have to look behind it to determine its validity. Other alleged probable cause for defendant\u2019s stop is immaterial. United States v. Cox, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7551 (W.D.Ky. Jan. 14, 2022).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
A ShotSpotter alert four minutes earlier brought officers and defendant\u2019s car was the only one in the area at the time. Defendant\u2019s demeanor while walking suggested he had a gun on him. The stop was valid. When questioned, defendant said he just left a friend\u2019s but he couldn\u2019t name him. A patdown validly produced meth. State v. Carter<\/a>, 2022-Ohio-91, 2022 Ohio App. LEXIS 78 (2d Dist. Jan. 13, 2022).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n Heck bar applies to plaintiff\u2019s claim his parole was unlawfully extended. Brennan v. Allison, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7312 (E.D.Cal. Jan. 12, 2022).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" If there is an arrest warrant, the executing officer doesn\u2019t have to look behind it to determine its validity. Other alleged probable cause for defendant\u2019s stop is immaterial. United States v. Cox, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7551 (W.D.Ky. Jan. 14, … Continue reading