Defendant argues that the inventory was pretextual to search for evidence of crime, except that there already was probable cause at that point for an automobile exception search. On a later vehicle search, there also was a warrant. Failing to challenge the search warrant for the car obviates the automobile exception. United States v. Phillips, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7162 (N.D.Okla. Jan. 13, 2022).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Information about defendant\u2019s LPN captured by a license plate reader didn\u2019t violate any reasonable expectation of privacy under Jones or Carpenter. United States v. Porter, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6755 (N.D.Ill. Jan. 13, 2022).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Defendant didn\u2019t appeal from the order sealing a search warrant so it can\u2019t be considered. State v. Justice<\/a>, 2022-Ohio-87, 2022 Ohio App. LEXIS 65 (10th Dist. Jan. 13, 2022).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Defendant argues that the inventory was pretextual to search for evidence of crime, except that there already was probable cause at that point for an automobile exception search. On a later vehicle search, there also was a warrant. Failing to … Continue reading