Defendant called 911 to report he was shot by a masked assailant and asked for help. That was implied consent for EMTs and police to enter either by implied consent or the emergency exception. Once investigating, they concluded defendant more than likely shot himself, and he would have been a felon in possession. Therefore, they sought a search warrant for the premises. United States v. Gaye, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 226149 (D.Colo. Nov. 12, 2021).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
There was no consent for the officers\u2019 entry into defendant\u2019s house, and there was no other legal justification. The good faith exception doesn\u2019t apply. United States v. Watkins, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 225499 (W.D.N.C. Nov. 23, 2021).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
There is no co-conspirator standing, if that\u2019s what this is. \u201cBeing an organizer or officer of a corporation, though, does not automatically confer standing to challenge a search of corporate property.\u201d United States v. Charles, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 225500 (E.D.Ark. Nov. 23, 2021).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Defendant called 911 to report he was shot by a masked assailant and asked for help. That was implied consent for EMTs and police to enter either by implied consent or the emergency exception. Once investigating, they concluded defendant more … Continue reading