The search warrant for the premises also permitted a search of defendant\u2019s locked separate bedroom only accessible from the common area. United States v. Cecchetelli, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 224649 (D.Mass. Nov. 22, 2021).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
A host of things added up to reasonable suspicion for continuing defendant\u2019s stop. United States v. Hernandez-Bourdier<\/a>, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 34598 (3d Cir. Nov. 22, 2021).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n Defendant was arguably unlawfully stopped leaving a drug house, and he was found to be a probation absconder. \u201cThe district court correctly held that Holmlund’s discovery of Galliher’s absconder status was an intervening circumstance that provided a lawful reason to detain Galliher, independent of anything that had happened before.\u201d) United States v. Galliher<\/a>, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 34630 (9th Cir. Nov. 22, 2021).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" The search warrant for the premises also permitted a search of defendant\u2019s locked separate bedroom only accessible from the common area. United States v. Cecchetelli, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 224649 (D.Mass. Nov. 22, 2021). A host of things added up … Continue reading