Defendant does not get a hearing on application of the good faith exception. The papers as a whole establish it for the government. The affidavit for the warrant showed sufficient information from observations for an inference that drugs were being dealt out of the apartment. United States v. Lyon, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 218380 (E.D.Wis. Sept. 29, 2021), adopted, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 217366 (E.D.Wis. Nov. 10, 2021).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The court grants a Franks hearing on defendant\u2019s substantial preliminary showing of omissions from the affidavit. United States v. Hueston, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 217596 (N.D.Ind. Nov. 10, 2021).* (After the court tells us what\u2019s missing from the affidavit, one wonders why it didn\u2019t just grant the motion to suppress for lack of a showing of probable cause, unless, of course, this is a reflection of how easy it is for the government to show probable cause in obtaining a warrant that is practically not subject to review if it\u2019s anywhere close.)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Defendant does not get a hearing on application of the good faith exception. The papers as a whole establish it for the government. The affidavit for the warrant showed sufficient information from observations for an inference that drugs were being … Continue reading