Failure to preserve a recording of issuance of a search warrant as required by New York law is not a Fourth Amendment issue. United States v. Bailey, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 212869 (W.D.N.Y. Nov. 3, 2021).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cRecognizing that this case is pending in the Eleventh Circuit rather than the Ninth, Grimes concedes that binding precedent permits CBP officers like the ones in this case to conduct a search of a traveler’s electronic devices without reasonable suspicion when a person is entering the United States, and Grimes acknowledges that his motion will be denied.\u201d United States v. Grimes, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 212230 (N.D.Ga. Sept. 28, 2021).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
In extraditions, \u201cThe standard of proof to find evidence \u2018sufficient to sustain the charge\u2019 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. \u00a7 3184 is equivalent to the domestic requirement of probable cause.\u201d In re Extradition of Villegas, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 212646 (W.D.Tex. Oct. 29, 2021).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Failure to preserve a recording of issuance of a search warrant as required by New York law is not a Fourth Amendment issue. United States v. Bailey, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 212869 (W.D.N.Y. Nov. 3, 2021). \u201cRecognizing that this case … Continue reading