\u201cBased upon the magnitude of the facts described in the search warrant affidavit, the issuing judge was justified in drawing a reasonable inference that physical evidence of Defendant’s alleged robberies would be found at his home. Defendant’s charged crimes, two counts of robbery and two counts of using a firearm in connection with a crime of violence, involve physical evidence that was expected to be found in the perpetrator’s home, such as cash, a gun, and clothing.\u201d United States v. Wright, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 191663 (E.D.Pa. Oct. 4, 2021).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
A monitored call between a CI and defendant was probable cause for a search. United States v. Badley, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 191482 (N.D.Ohio Oct. 5, 2021).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
There was probable cause for the search warrant for defendant\u2019s place, and his Franks challenge fails for a conclusory offer of proof. Collier v. United States, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 191527 (D.N.D. Oct. 5, 2021).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
\u201cBased upon the magnitude of the facts described in the search warrant affidavit, the issuing judge was justified in drawing a reasonable inference that physical evidence of Defendant’s alleged robberies would be found at his home. Defendant’s charged crimes, two … Continue reading