{"id":49816,"date":"2021-09-30T07:12:46","date_gmt":"2021-09-30T12:12:46","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=49816"},"modified":"2021-09-30T07:12:46","modified_gmt":"2021-09-30T12:12:46","slug":"e-d-wis-threat-to-arrest-high-school-student-for-social-media-post-about-covid-violates-1a","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=49816","title":{"rendered":"E.D.Wis.: Threat to arrest high school student for social media post about Covid violates 1A"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Officer\u2019s threatening to arrest a high school student and her parents for disorderly conduct if she didn\u2019t take down a social media post about her exposure to Covid violated the First Amendment. <a href=\"https:\/\/will-law.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/cohoon-decision.pdf\">Cohoon v. Konrath<\/a>, No. 20-cv-0620-BHL (E.D.Wis. Sept. 24, 2021).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cPetitioner does contend that the evidence he seeks will \u2018prove\u2019 that he was \u2018illegally arrested way before the line-up even took place.\u2019 Id. This claim sounds in the Fourth Amendment, suggesting that Petitioner believes he was arrested without probable cause and that the subsequent line-up constitutes the fruit of that poisonous tree. This assertion, however, cannot be a basis for habeas review in light of Stone v. Powell, 428 U.S. 465, 494 (1976).\u201d Daniels v. Royce, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 185768 (E.D.N.Y. Sept. 28, 2021).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Defendant\u2019s 2255 challenged defense counsel\u2019s \u201cfailure to prepare\u201d for his suppression hearing on a Franks issue. The crux of the issue, however, is defense counsel found no false statements and defendant doesn\u2019t even point any out. United States v. Dehate, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 186535 (E.D.Mich. Sept. 29, 2021).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Officer\u2019s threatening to arrest a high school student and her parents for disorderly conduct if she didn\u2019t take down a social media post about her exposure to Covid violated the First Amendment. Cohoon v. Konrath, No. 20-cv-0620-BHL (E.D.Wis. Sept. 24, &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=49816\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[50,21,23,126],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-49816","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-arrest-or-entry-on-arrest","category-franks-doctrine","category-ineffective-assistance","category-issue-preclusion"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/49816","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=49816"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/49816\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":49817,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/49816\/revisions\/49817"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=49816"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=49816"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=49816"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}