The court having reviewed the dashcam, the officer lacked reasonable suspicion for a traffic stop. The government\u2019s alternative argument that there was generalized reasonable suspicion of drug dealing isn\u2019t timely. On the merits, it still is inadequate. United States v. Abreu, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 151732 (D.N.J. Aug. 12, 2021).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The district court erred in dismissing this case under a broad Rooker-Feldman view rather than individualized claims. One claim was under the Fourth Amendment. Remanded. Behr v. Campbell<\/a>, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 24025 (11th Cir. Aug. 12, 2021).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n Here the officer had no reasonable suspicion to continue the stop as long as he did. Suppression granted. [There is a helpful discussion of the “Rodriguez moment” where the stop turned from traffic stop to criminal investigation.] United States v. Hunter, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 151697 (E.D.Pa. Aug. 12, 2021).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n Defendant\u2019s testimony he didn\u2019t consent to search of his car is found not credible. He\u2019d previously filed an affidavit that he didn\u2019t remember. Instead, the officer is found credible. United States v. Taylor, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 151667 (E.D.Mich. Aug. 12, 2021).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" The court having reviewed the dashcam, the officer lacked reasonable suspicion for a traffic stop. The government\u2019s alternative argument that there was generalized reasonable suspicion of drug dealing isn\u2019t timely. On the merits, it still is inadequate. United States v. … Continue reading