Defendant\u2019s contention is that the warrant issuing judge issues no-knock warrants without question is not shown to be a basis to suppress under Hudson v. Michigan. The remedy is a 1983 action. United States v. Bryant, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 149888 (N.D.Miss. Aug. 10, 2021).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
There was reasonable suspicion for continuation of the stop to then use a drug dog. United States v. Williams, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 149032 (W.D.Mich. Aug. 9, 2021).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The traffic stop here was reasonable, and then a gun was in plain view justifying this search. United States v. Ashford, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 149262 (W.D.Okla. Aug. 9, 2021).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The corroborated CI\u2019s information was sufficient for probable cause for the house. The warrant for the house permitted search of defendant\u2019s car outside. United States v. Hill<\/a>, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 23648 (8th Cir. Aug. 10, 2021).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Defendant\u2019s contention is that the warrant issuing judge issues no-knock warrants without question is not shown to be a basis to suppress under Hudson v. Michigan. The remedy is a 1983 action. United States v. Bryant, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading