{"id":49148,"date":"2021-07-20T07:42:17","date_gmt":"2021-07-20T12:42:17","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=49148"},"modified":"2021-07-20T11:23:54","modified_gmt":"2021-07-20T16:23:54","slug":"ca7-officers-complied-with-law-in-getting-csli-by-exigency-carpenter-came-two-months-after-trial","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=49148","title":{"rendered":"CA7: Officers complied with law in getting CSLI by exigency; <em>Carpenter<\/em> came two months after trial"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Defendant was the subject of exigency based efforts to get his CSLI because he was actively being pursued as involved in a 2013 burglary investigation scoring 25 firearms. The CSLI request complied with the law at the time. Carpenter was decided two months after his trial. The good faith exception applied. In addition, inevitable discovery applies. The government showed a clear chain of probable cause and events. <a href=\"http:\/\/media.ca7.uscourts.gov\/cgi-bin\/rssExec.pl?Submit=Display&amp;Path=Y2021\/D07-19\/C:20-2330:J:Ripple:aut:T:fnOp:N:2735247:S:0\">United States v. Rosario<\/a>, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 21234 (7th Cir. July 19, 2021).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>2255 petitioner seeks review of the state court decision denying his motion to suppress at the trial court level and then on appeal. He utilized the full processes of the state court hearing, appeal, and petition for review. The federal court\u2019s can\u2019t review this decision. Sanchez v. Koenig, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 134106 (S.D.Cal. July 16, 2021) (R&amp;R).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Defendant was the subject of exigency based efforts to get his CSLI because he was actively being pursued as involved in a 2013 burglary investigation scoring 25 firearms. The CSLI request complied with the law at the time. Carpenter was &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=49148\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[84,11,126],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-49148","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-cell-site-location-information","category-good-faith-exception","category-issue-preclusion"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/49148","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=49148"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/49148\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":49152,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/49148\/revisions\/49152"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=49148"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=49148"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=49148"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}