Defendants having an ATM machine in a shopping cart late at night during a BLM \u201cdisturbance\u201d was reasonable suspicion. United States v. Pennycooke, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 132128 (E.D. Pa. July 15, 2021).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Since defendant concedes there was probable cause for this stop, the dog sniff was reasonable. United States v. Munoz, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 131965 (E.D. Ky. July 14, 2021).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Defendant\u2019s fanny pack across his chest looked too heavy and was stretched. The officers testified credibly they couldn\u2019t see the L-shape of a gun, but they could see what had to be the slide. \u201cOfficer Rios and Sergeant Counihan also noticed the unusual bulge and the weight of the item in the fanny pack and that it was being worn in an unusual manner, although neither alerted to a horizontal rigid line as had Officer Migliaccio. \u2026 Officer Migliaccio also noticed that Hagood was wearing blue\u2014which he recognized as a color sometimes worn by rival gangs of the Bloods.\u201d United States v. Hagood, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 132085 (S.D.N.Y. July 15, 2021).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Defendants having an ATM machine in a shopping cart late at night during a BLM \u201cdisturbance\u201d was reasonable suspicion. United States v. Pennycooke, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 132128 (E.D. Pa. July 15, 2021).* Since defendant concedes there was probable cause … Continue reading