{"id":49051,"date":"2021-07-12T07:45:59","date_gmt":"2021-07-12T12:45:59","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=49051"},"modified":"2021-07-13T16:24:11","modified_gmt":"2021-07-13T21:24:11","slug":"oh5-exclusionary-rule-does-not-apply-in-child-protection-cases","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=49051","title":{"rendered":"OH5: Exclusionary rule does not apply in child protection cases"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>\u201cWhile this appears to be a case of first impression in Ohio, other states have uniformly held the Fourth Amendment&#8217;s exclusionary rule does not apply in child protection cases.\u201d It follows State ex rel. A.R. v. C.R., 1999 UT 43, 982 P.2d 73, \u00b6s 19-21, holding that it does not in Ohio. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.supremecourt.ohio.gov\/rod\/docs\/pdf\/5\/2021\/2021-Ohio-2369.pdf\">In re R.R.<\/a>, 2021-Ohio-2369, 2021 Ohio App. LEXIS 2324 (5th Dist. July 7, 2021).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Denial of a motion to suppress would not be reconsidered in a 2255 because the prior ruling on the merits is res judicata, and the 2255 is untimely. United States v. White, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 127938 (S.D. Ohio July 9, 2021).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A search warrant that includes particular attachments is particular. United States v. Bowers, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 127998 (W.D. Pa. July 8, 2021).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\u201cWhile this appears to be a case of first impression in Ohio, other states have uniformly held the Fourth Amendment&#8217;s exclusionary rule does not apply in child protection cases.\u201d It follows State ex rel. A.R. v. C.R., 1999 UT 43, &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=49051\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[14,126,65],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-49051","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-exclusionary-rule","category-issue-preclusion","category-particularity"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/49051","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=49051"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/49051\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":49067,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/49051\/revisions\/49067"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=49051"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=49051"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=49051"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}