A blast from the past not seen in the case law in years: Defendant has no reasonable expectation of privacy in not providing a voice examplar on the government\u2019s motion. United States v. McClain, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 124835 (W.D. Ark. July 2, 2021) (parties work out the details).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
As to lack of inventory, even if true, it\u2019s not a ground for suppression. Defendant didn\u2019t properly preserve his issues of the scope of search warrant for blood analysis and lack of inventory in the trial court so the state could rebut them at the hearing. Thus, they are waived. State v. Patel<\/a>, 2021 Tex. App. LEXIS 5335 (Tex. App. \u2013 Dallas July 2, 2021).<\/p>\n\n\n\n Obvious date typo in master Title III affidavit would be overlooked. The wiretap did not start before it was authorized. United States v. Brown, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 124424 (M.D. Pa. July 2, 2021);* United States v. Thompson, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12443 (M.D. Pa. July 2, 2021).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" A blast from the past not seen in the case law in years: Defendant has no reasonable expectation of privacy in not providing a voice examplar on the government\u2019s motion. United States v. McClain, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 124835 (W.D. … Continue reading