{"id":48905,"date":"2021-06-29T07:21:04","date_gmt":"2021-06-29T12:21:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=48905"},"modified":"2021-06-29T07:21:37","modified_gmt":"2021-06-29T12:21:37","slug":"id-automobile-exception-doesnt-apply-to-purse-that-used-to-be-in-car-before-pc-developed","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=48905","title":{"rendered":"ID: Automobile exception doesn&#8217;t apply to purse that used to be in car before PC developed"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Defendant\u2019s purse was not in the car at the time probable cause arose for the automobile exception to apply. Therefore, it did not apply to her purse. <a href=\"https:\/\/isc.idaho.gov\/opinions\/47365.pdf\">State v. Maloney<\/a>, 2021 Ida. LEXIS 117 (June 28, 2021).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cIt is unnecessary for us to address Priest&#8217;s argument that the force used by Grazier and Fenwick was excessive under the Fourth Amendment because regardless, Priest fails to show that Grazier and Fenwick violated clearly established law by using force as they did to bring him under control. \u2026 This is so because Priest offers no evidence genuinely to dispute the officers&#8217; evidence that they perceived Priest to be resisting arrest when they employed the force at issue. We examine each use of force in turn.\u201d Priest v. Grazier, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 19029 (5th Cir. June 25, 2021).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Defendant\u2019s purse was not in the car at the time probable cause arose for the automobile exception to apply. Therefore, it did not apply to her purse. State v. Maloney, 2021 Ida. LEXIS 117 (June 28, 2021). \u201cIt is unnecessary &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=48905\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[36,52,40],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-48905","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-automobile-exception","category-excessive-force","category-qualified-immunity"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/48905","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=48905"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/48905\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":48907,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/48905\/revisions\/48907"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=48905"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=48905"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=48905"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}