Even crediting defendant\u2019s version of events, the exclusionary rule would not be applied to the video of defendant\u2019s violent resistance during his arrest. United States v. Hill, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 111803 (S.D. Ind. June 14, 2021).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Defendant\u2019s new crime during his arrest obviates an exclusionary rule inquiry. United States v. Patton, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 111651 (E.D. La. June 15, 2021).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
First time CI\u2019s information that started with a buy off defendant a month earlier, helped support a 30 day ping warrant on defendant\u2019s phone. United States v. Lockett, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 111939 (M.D. La. June 14, 2021).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The officer\u2019s unreasonable mistake of fact of the need for a motorist to pull over for a stopped emergency vehicle on a two lane road led to granting the motion to suppress the stop. United States v. Vongphachanh, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 111814 (N.D. Ind. June 15, 2021).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Even crediting defendant\u2019s version of events, the exclusionary rule would not be applied to the video of defendant\u2019s violent resistance during his arrest. United States v. Hill, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 111803 (S.D. Ind. June 14, 2021). Defendant\u2019s new crime … Continue reading