Kik\u2019s duty to report child pornography on its platform under 18 U.S.C. \u00a7 2258A doesn\u2019t make its search still not a private search. United States v. Hart, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 111166 (M.D. Pa. June 14, 2021).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The trial court applied the wrong constitutional standard of review to plaintiff\u2019s claim that a mask mandate violated his right of privacy. Remanded to apply strict scrutiny, if there is still standing because the mask mandate has since been eliminated. Green v. Alachua Cty.<\/a>, 2021 Fla. App. LEXIS 8634 (Fla. 1st DCA June 10, 2021).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n It was objectively unreasonable for defendant to be handcuffed for officer safety. State v. Phillips<\/a>, 312 Ore. App. 239, 2021 Ore. App. LEXIS 799 (June 9, 2021).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n There was probable cause to arrest defendant on a bus. He matched the description of robber in a prior heist from a video, and that man escaped on a bus. Commonwealth v. Browning<\/a>, 2021 Mass. App. LEXIS 69 (June 14, 2021).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Kik\u2019s duty to report child pornography on its platform under 18 U.S.C. \u00a7 2258A doesn\u2019t make its search still not a private search. United States v. Hart, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 111166 (M.D. Pa. June 14, 2021). The trial court … Continue reading