Inevitable discovery also supports the consent search of defendant\u2019s cell phone obtained at the Sarita, Texas checkpoint. The officers had probable cause and told him they\u2019d get a search warrant and he consented instead. The matter was clearly under active investigation. United States v. Reyes-Herrera, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 101416 (S.D. Tex. May 28, 2021).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Defendant\u2019s objection to the R&R was general and pointed out no particular error, and thus there was no clear error. United States v. Latourell, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 101555 (D. Minn. May 28, 2021).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Plaintiff\u2019s Tasing during an apparent psychotic break when police were called a second time was objectively reasonable. Estate of Erwin v. Greene County, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 16102 (6th Cir. May 26, 2021).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Directing defendant during a traffic stop to get out of the car and stand on the sidewalk was a detention, but it was reasonable. State v. Hampton<\/a>, 2021-Ohio-1834, 2021 Ohio App. LEXIS 1787 (2d Dist. May 28, 2021).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Inevitable discovery also supports the consent search of defendant\u2019s cell phone obtained at the Sarita, Texas checkpoint. The officers had probable cause and told him they\u2019d get a search warrant and he consented instead. The matter was clearly under active … Continue reading